¶ 8 New Legal from Civil Is attractive correctly seen that $85, contour to the value of the house or property was at the higher end of your own guess produced by Mr. Robey, that is on the real estate industry. Mr. Robey as well as testified the house or property try resold getting $71,, and therefore count the new demonstration courtroom try absolve to deal with much more an indicator out of market price. Properly, you to wisdom are supported by the evidence demonstrated, and will not in any way contradict the brand new findings of fact from the demo judge.
¶ nine This new Robeys and assert that the demonstration legal erred in decreasing to help you honor her or him an attorney’s payment. They believe as findings of-fact become “a reasonable lawyer percentage to-be put from the Legal abreast of best software” the legal is required to award the fresh attorney’s payment. The fresh new trial legal appear to reconsidered you to award as journal entryway denied the newest Robeys a keen attorney’s percentage. The fresh Courtroom out of Civil Is attractive confirmed.
First Federal Bank, 1970 Ok 162, 475 P
¶ 10 The Robeys claim he or she is eligible to a keen attorney’s payment pursuant so you can 42 O.S.2001, § 176, which provides: “During the a hobby brought to demand any lien the newest party for exactly who view try rendered will likely be entitled to recover a reasonable attorney’s fee, becoming fixed by judge, which is taxed while the costs about step.” This new Robeys dispute their step facing A lot of time Seashore is actually for starvation of its statutory proper just like the lienholders so you can redeem the property, that renders the experience one enforce an excellent lien.
¶ 11 Title 42 O.S.2001, § 19 brings this option who has an excellent lien that’s inferior to another on the same property have a right to get the house or property in the sense as its manager you will, on superior lien. The Robeys encountered the legal to get the house or property regarding Much time Coastline. The latest Robeys was in fact awarded injuries by demonstration court because Long Seashore had observe they reported a great lien in the assets. a dozen O.S.2001, § 764(A)(1). When A lot of time Seashore don’t offer find of your own foreclosure and you will deals, it avoided this new Robeys away from redeeming the house or property. Those legal rights try statutory occurring out of the lien the fresh Robeys had resistant to the property.
The senior lienholder intervened and effectively situated new top priority of the lien
¶ twelve Long Beach compares the main points in cases like this to Frontier Given. Sav. and you can Loan Ass’n vmercial Bank, 1990 Ok CIV Software 105, 806 P.2d 1140. payday loans Georgia In that case, one or two banking companies stored notes made by an identical debtor. The $31, notice stored by Industrial Financial is secured of the other commercial paper, which had been including into the standard. The banks alone charged this new borrower, and once bringing wisdom, Commercial Bank marketed the newest collateral from the sheriff’s income, with observe to help you Boundary. Frontier objected, but failed to focus regarding verification acquisition. Boundary after that recorded another action, claiming which stored a duly-learned shelter interest in the collateralized commercial paper by advantage of an article-view garnishment continuing, and you can found actual and you can punitive damages to have losses incurred due to Commercial Bank’s technically-unreasonably acts. This new trial court governed and only Commercial Financial, but refused Commercial’s app getting a keen attorney’s payment not as much as § 176. This new Court out of Is attractive confirmed, accepting your match was not you to enforce a great lien, one Boundary Lender actually had no lien with the collateralized commercial papers. However, the fresh Robeys had good lien to the real estate foreclosed from the A lot of time Seashore.
¶ 13 Brand new Frontier case cites it Court’s decision as a whole Electronic Borrowing Corp. v. 2d 137, once the power for its carrying. In general Digital, the latest junior lienholder charged the primary debtors. The newest elder lienholder after that tried to gather a keen attorney’s percentage away from the brand new junior lienholder. The fresh new trial legal declined the price tag, and that Judge confirmed, observing your lienholders hadn’t affirmatively asserted their says up against both, but rather merely resistant to the debtor. General Electronic, 1970 Ok 162, ¶ 8, 475 P.2d during the 138. This new Robeys provides asserted the allege up against Long Beach, and that differentiates this example out of Standard Digital.
Deja una respuesta