These organizations didn’t disagree in their rates out-of intimate abuse (twenty-five

These organizations didn’t disagree in their rates out-of intimate abuse (twenty-five

Comorbidity among axis II diagnoses was common. Subjects met the criteria for an average of 2.4 personality disorder diagnoses (SD=1.6). The subjects with borderline personality disorder were more likely than those without borderline personality disorder to meet the criteria for histrionic (29.2% versus 5.6%; ? 2 =, df=1, p<0.0005), narcissistic (30.6% versus 15.7%; ? 2 =5.59, df=1, p=0.02), and antisocial (12.5% versus 3.7%; ? 2 =4.98, df=1, p=0.03) personality disorder. Subjects with paranoid personality disorder were more likely than those without paranoid personality disorder to meet the criteria for schizotypal (49.2% versus 20.5%; ? 2 =, df=1, p<0.0005), narcissistic (33.3% versus 15.4%; ? 2 =7.77, df=1, p=0.005), histrionic (23.5% versus 10.3%; ? 2 =5.90, df=1, p=0.02), and antisocial (12.7% versus 4.3%; ? 2 =4.34, df=1, p=0.03) personality disorder. Subjects with borderline personality disorder had a higher number of personality disorder diagnoses (other than borderline personality disorder) than subjects without borderline personality disorder (mean=2.3 diagnoses, SD=1.7, versus mean=1.8 diagnoses, SD=1.1; t=–2.35, df=178, p=0.02). Subjects with paranoid personality disorder also had a higher number of personality disorders (other than paranoid personality disorder) than subjects without paranoid personality disorder (mean=2.5 diagnoses, SD=1.7, versus mean=1.8 diagnoses, SD=1.1; t=–3.44, df=178, p=0.001).

Traumatization in the Youngsters or Adolescence

Desk dos reveals the brand new incidence of connection with traumatization throughout the youthfulness/puberty into the victims with and you will in place of borderline identity disorder. Subjects which have borderline identity illness got significantly higher costs away from actual discipline in the youthfulness/adolescence than simply sufferers instead of borderline personality sickness, having gender controlled (52.8% instead of 34.3%; ? dos =5.43, df=step 1, p=0.02), however the teams don’t differ inside their costs from intimate abuse (29.2% instead of 19.4%; ? dos =step one.46, df=step one, p=0.23) otherwise regarding other kinds of trauma in youth/adolescence.

Subjects which have paranoid identity diseases together with got a considerably high rate from bodily abuse for the youth/puberty than just sufferers versus paranoid identity infection, with sex managed (54.0% as opposed to 35.0%; ? dos =5.70, df=1, p=0.02). 4% instead of twenty-two.2%; ? dos =0.23, df=1, p=0.63) or away from other types of upheaval inside youthfulness/puberty. The relationships regarding youth/teenage physical abuse with borderline character sickness and with paranoid personality infection was in fact and examined by using each of the most other character disorder diagnoses as even more covariates, and abilities had been statistically equivalent.

Victims that have antisocial identity infection had been probably be as opposed to those instead of antisocial personality sickness to possess come bereaved in the teens (53.8% rather than 21.0%; ? dos =seven.67, df=1, p=0.006). Not one of your other types of identity disorder are rather and you will definitely for the sexual abuse, physical discipline, otherwise some of the other kinds of shock inside the young people/puberty.

Shock when you look at the Adulthood

Brand new pricing out of experience of injury from inside the adulthood from inside the sufferers which have and you will rather than borderline identification sickness are also found for the Desk 2. Borderline character disorder was not somewhat for the physical assault, sexual physical violence, or other particular trauma inside the adulthood, with age and you can sex regulated. Victims with paranoid identity illness have been more almost certainly than others in the place of paranoid identity sickness for experienced actual violence into the adulthood, as we age and intercourse regulated (33.0% in the place of 17.9%; ? 2 =4.84, df=1, p=0.03). Individuals with paranoid identification ailment and additionally had high prices from crashes/burns (63.5% versus 47.0%; ? dos =cuatro.86, df=1, p=0.03) and you will handle (9.5% as opposed to step 1.7%; ? dos =6.48, df=step one, p=0.01) than others without the infection, however these differences weren’t mathematically significant following negative effects of multiple contrasting were managed. Not one of one’s other sorts of identity infection was notably relevant that have almost any traumatization for the adulthood.

Frequency from PTSD

The fresh new existence incidence regarding PTSD within this gang of subjects is actually 17.8% (N=32). The brand new rates out-of PTSD in women (19.0%, N=12) and you may boys (17.1%, N=20) weren’t rather additional (? 2 =0.eleven, df=1, p=0.74). PTSD is most typical inside victims having paranoid (29%) and borderline (25%) character diseases, and you may the very least well-known for the sufferers with narcissistic (10%) and passive aggressive (12%) character infection. With the leftover version of personality disease, the brand new prevalence away from PTSD ranged regarding fourteen% in order to 18%. Victims that have and you will without PTSD didn’t disagree in their full quantity http://www.datingranking.net/cs/senior-friend-finder-recenze of personality problems diagnoses (mean=dos.5, SD=step one.dos, rather than suggest=dos.cuatro, SD=step 1.6; t=–0.thirty six, df=178, p=0.72).


Publicado

en

por

Etiquetas:

Comentarios

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *